Title: 22nd James Bond: Quantum of Solace
Description: New Trailer Up!
Random Hero - July 1, 2008 04:51 AM (GMT)
New James Bond Trailer!Looks friggin awesome, didn't expect this until well into 2009. :o Movie looks great, trailer was for the most part very well done except when they completely forced in the opera bond theme at the end, doesn't flow well.
Resident-Seven - July 1, 2008 05:30 AM (GMT)
The release date has been Nov 08 since before Casino Royale came out. lol
Random Hero - July 1, 2008 07:37 AM (GMT)
Really? Well i'm a bit of a dolt then :lol: Still, it's pretty impressive that it hasn't been delayed at all.
Resident-Seven - July 1, 2008 08:46 AM (GMT)
Yeah, they like setting dates way in the future. Like how Iron Man 2, Narnia 3, and the 2 Hobbit movies all have dates already.
Inquisitor - July 1, 2008 09:45 AM (GMT)
SICK! Looks flippin sick.
Drake - July 1, 2008 10:55 AM (GMT)
Heck yeah I got goosebumps! And its my first most anticipated movie in 2 years.. second is dark knight :)
/backslash - July 1, 2008 11:06 AM (GMT)
Eh, looks alright I guess :P I don't really like Daniel Craig which puts me off
Drake - July 1, 2008 11:54 AM (GMT)
You're kidding right? I thought he was so damn convincing as Bond in Casino Royale, imagine if Eric Bana got the part instead urgh!
/backslash - July 1, 2008 12:25 PM (GMT)
I dunno, he doesn't seem very Bond-y to me. I guess its because I grew up on the Pierce Bronsman franchise so I'm used to him instead. Wouldn't have minded Eric Bana but he's not exactly the 007 type
/backslash - September 20, 2008 04:52 PM (GMT)
borgster101 - September 21, 2008 04:04 AM (GMT)
/backslash - September 21, 2008 04:30 AM (GMT)
Kill Bill's 5,6,7,8's would've worked better than The Stripes :P
Random Hero - September 21, 2008 01:05 PM (GMT)
Not even close to being as good as You Know My Name. I still think Goldfinger has the best theme song.
/backslash - September 23, 2008 04:12 AM (GMT)
Qubert - October 1, 2008 10:13 AM (GMT)
I checked the movie at Wiki and i saw that the running time was only an hour 46 minutes which in my opinion is kinda short compared to casino royales 2 hours and 15-20 minutes,
also the movies budget is significantly higher than Casino Royale's 76 million dollars more!!
I hope that that doesn't translate into the movie turning into a fireworks display with something blowing up every 2 to 3 minutes, and the idea of martin campbell not directing has me worried also
I have really high hopes for this one. And i would be really be disappointed if its not at least as good as Cr was
thoughts??
/backslash - October 1, 2008 10:30 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Qubert) |
I checked the movie at Wiki and i saw that the running time was only an hour 46 minutes which in my opinion is kinda short compared to casino royales 2 hours and 15-20 minutes,
also the movies budget is significantly higher than Casino Royale's 76 million dollars more!!
I hope that that doesn't translate into the movie turning into a fireworks display with something blowing up every 2 to 3 minutes, and the idea of martin campbell not directing has me worried also
I have really high hopes for this one. And i would be really be disappointed if its not at least as good as Cr was
thoughts?? |
106 minutes is still plenty of time, I don't think it needs to be more than 2 hours long to be good. I think the extra money was used for stunts, Casino Royale spent most of its time at a card table and walking around a hotel smashing the odd mirror