Title: The upcoming election
Description: What is wrong with the Liberals?
Beast - April 16, 2007 12:46 PM (GMT)
So according to Lateline tonight, despite the apparent plot to stage a dawn service, Labor will have moved further ahead in tomorrows newspoll.
Now personally this doesn't surprise me at all, because what we've seen constantly from the Liberal party is attacks against Labor based on completely trivial matters.
Sure Kevin Rudd met with Brian Burke, but so did lots and lots of people. It's not a significant issue.
Sure Kevin Rudd's memory of his fathers death and the surrounding events when he was 11 may be glorified but it's not a significant issue.
Sure Kevin Rudd may have been going to do a staged Anzac dawn service, but it's not a significant issue.
Why don't the liberals understand this? The Australian public doesn't care about issues of such insignificance. They don't directly effect any of us. The Australian public cares about the integrity of leaders when it turns out Australia was giving money to a corrupt dictator or when we go to war with the corrupt dictator we were giving money to. The Australia public cares about health and education, not what happened to our future prime minister when he was 11.
Do the Liberals actually want to win the next election? Can they possibly be so deluded to think that constantly talking about such minor issues will result in anything other than people just getting sick of hearing the Liberals talk?
_MetalliX_ - April 16, 2007 01:06 PM (GMT)
I'm most likely just going to vote for Pedro. Honestly, I'm not big on politics.
However I am confused in regards to this latest scandal. Firstly, how can you hold a false dawn ceremony? Secondly, why is a dawn ceremony a bad thing?
Ninja Catfish - April 16, 2007 02:53 PM (GMT)
I just realised I'm gonna have to vote in this :o
And I work for the government, so a vote for Labor will make me feel dirty...
Texta - April 16, 2007 11:05 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Ninja Catfish @ Apr 17 2007, 01:53 AM) |
I just realised I'm gonna have to vote in this :o
And I work for the government, so a vote for Labor will make me feel dirty... |
Not as dirty as voting for a party that let Australia give $300 million to Saddam Hussein. That was the Federal Liberal Government.
FreakTrigger - April 16, 2007 11:09 PM (GMT)
I just wish I had a lesser evil to choose from.
As it stands my vote's as red as my blood.
Drake - April 17, 2007 10:14 AM (GMT)
Kevin Rudd is still the underdog, In my opinion the Labor party is stale from the ground up, inside and out. Also, Rudd doesnt make policy the labor party and unions make policy which ain't good.
BrotherEstapol - April 17, 2007 02:52 PM (GMT)
I'm inclined to think that the whole "the unions run Labor" thing is bullshit propaganda...and of course the labor party make policy, it's not just Rudd sitting in a room all day writing up policies while the rest of the party sit down drinking tea; it's a team effort.
GO TEAM!
/backslash - April 17, 2007 03:36 PM (GMT)
There's an election?! Damn I hate being over 18..
I don't watch the news or read the business section of the newspaper, somebody tell me which person is the less evil one
borgster101 - April 18, 2007 06:55 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (/backslash @ Apr 18 2007, 01:36 AM) |
There's an election?! Damn I hate being over 18..
I don't watch the news or read the business section of the newspaper, somebody tell me which person is the less evil one |
That depends on your perspective :P
Beast - April 18, 2007 08:16 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (/backslash @ Apr 18 2007, 01:36 AM) |
There's an election?! Damn I hate being over 18..
I don't watch the news or read the business section of the newspaper, somebody tell me which person is the less evil one |
Kevin Rudd is the least evil. Also he looks like Tintin!
/backslash - April 18, 2007 11:04 AM (GMT)
wOOt! Anyone who looks like Tintin gets my vote :D
Quatters - April 19, 2007 02:53 AM (GMT)
I think the fact that Kevin Rudd is not evil is enough to secure him victory.
Qubert - April 19, 2007 08:12 AM (GMT)
Rudd danced on mornings with Kerri Anne, he just lost my vote. Yes, that's how lightly I take voting.
Inquisitor - April 19, 2007 12:59 PM (GMT)
Kevin Rudd really pisses me off for some reason. No idea why, but he does.
Texta - April 19, 2007 01:03 PM (GMT)
And
Here's why you'll never vote for the Liberals again. And if that isn't enough, watch the end of
this.
Super Mario - April 29, 2007 09:26 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Inquisitor @ Apr 19 2007, 10:59 PM) |
| Kevin Rudd really pisses me off for some reason. No idea why, but he does. |
Same here, he seems pretty far up himself.
Quatters - April 30, 2007 02:17 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Super Mario @ Apr 30 2007, 07:26 AM) |
| QUOTE (Inquisitor @ Apr 19 2007, 10:59 PM) | | Kevin Rudd really pisses me off for some reason. No idea why, but he does. |
Same here, he seems pretty far up himself.
|
And John Howard isn't?????!?!?!
Gio - May 1, 2007 01:32 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Quatters @ Apr 30 2007, 12:17 PM) |
| QUOTE (Super Mario @ Apr 30 2007, 07:26 AM) | | QUOTE (Inquisitor @ Apr 19 2007, 10:59 PM) | | Kevin Rudd really pisses me off for some reason. No idea why, but he does. |
Same here, he seems pretty far up himself.
|
And John Howard isn't?????!?!?!
|
He doesn't seem to. He always looks like he's about to cry.
Random Hero - May 1, 2007 06:40 AM (GMT)
Can a third candidate enter? Mark Lathum should run again! :D :P
BrotherEstapol - May 1, 2007 07:54 AM (GMT)
Duh, 3rd candidate is Bob Brown, the Greens bloke. :P
I wish Natasha Stott Despoja was still leading the Democrats...she was a fiesty young lass! :D
Random Hero - May 1, 2007 08:11 AM (GMT)
Oh yeah the greens, they're basically invisible anyway. :P
Beast - May 1, 2007 10:29 AM (GMT)
It's not a presidential election. You vote for the people you like, in order of preference in your electorate. There can be any number of political parties with leaders running for election in any electorate, although you can't win government unless you get a majority, so you have to have candidates for your party running in at least 51% of electorates and all would be better.