View Full Version: GameBoy Evolution

Evolution > Handheld Central > GameBoy Evolution

Pages: [1] 2


Title: GameBoy Evolution
Description: Portable GameCube in the works?


UltraGekko - January 21, 2005 07:41 AM (GMT)
Here's an interesting tidbit of information courtesy of IGN Cube's mailbag.

QUOTE
Matt responds: Don't let my rants fool you. I'm not down on the DS. I'm just waiting to see its true potential realized. As for the next Game Boy, which I'll call Game Boy Evolution since this seems to be the popular title for it, I'm extremely optimistic.

Actually, based on things I've heard, the paths of the DS and GBE have intersected already. Sources claim that the idea for the next Game Boy took flight right about the same time GameCube launched. The device was merely supposed to be a portable GameCube. Nintendo was hoping to create a synergy between the two platforms. However, for whatever reason -- probably an inability to miniaturize the GameCube at a consumer-friendly price -- the Game Boy successor was abandoned. Instead, Nintendo opted to use an old piece of tech: a hardware dubbed Nitro that was originally developed to be an update to the Game Boy line during the PS1 era. At former NCL president Hiroshi Yamauchi's suggestion, the tech was enhanced with a second screen and later a touch-sensitive interface. Thus, the DS was born.

What's interesting is that work on Game Boy Evolution is allegedly further along than most of us would probably guess. And more intriguing still, sources claim that Nintendo is once again trying to make the machine a portable GameCube.

If that comes to fruition, I will likely be singing the praises of Game Boy Evolution from the very start. It would be an amazing accomplishment. The machine would have a potential library of 500 games from launch. Imagine being able to play Wind Waker, Metroid Prime, Resident Evil 4, Wave Race, and Pikmin on the go. It's a Nintendo fan's dream come true.

If this is true it will make for a very interesting portable. Maybe there was a reason Nintendo opted to use 8cm discs for GameCube apart for piracy reasons.

Also interesting to note that DS existed in some shape or form during the PS1 era.

Also another rumour I've come across is that while there are no plans to connect the DS and the Revolution the GB Evolution is a different story.

BrotherEstapol - January 21, 2005 07:47 AM (GMT)
If that's true then all I can say to the people who said the next gameboy was the DS is: :upyours:


But yeah, if true, that would be fucking awesome. :P

Gio - January 21, 2005 07:50 AM (GMT)
As much as I like the DS, The Gamecubeboy ( :P ) will rock harder than anything that ever rocked.

Fyuusii - January 21, 2005 08:15 AM (GMT)
I think it's a little too soon to take anything seriously, really. One console/handheld release at a time please, gents. :P

Gio - January 21, 2005 08:49 AM (GMT)
I dont think it's to soon, something to look forward to in late 2006/early 2007. :P

Lazlow - January 21, 2005 03:57 PM (GMT)
Wait... the GCN has 8cm discs???!

[DZ] - January 21, 2005 09:17 PM (GMT)
I think its totally possible the Evolution is the next GameBoy. But launching it too soon would hurt the DS don't you think? :huh:

I am not interested thank you, bring me the PSP. :P

Fyuusii - January 22, 2005 05:40 AM (GMT)
QUOTE ([DZ] @ Jan 22 2005, 05:17 AM)
I think its totally possible the Evolution is the next GameBoy. But launching it too soon would hurt the DS don't you think? :huh:

I am not interested thank you, bring me the PSP. :P

It would hurt Nintendo economically, yes, but I doubt they would let it. :P

Keep in mind though that if ideas for the DS were thrown around well back in the PSOne era, we might not been seeing the Nintendo Evolution evolve into a commercial product for quite some time (if it even exists, a lot of "sources" I've seen for news recently have been far too questionable).

borgster101 - January 22, 2005 07:43 AM (GMT)
This is pretty stupid, the DS hasn't even come out yet and there is already discussion on the next Nintendo handheld :rolleyes:. The DS has gone off to a good start in both Japan and the US, and is now set to be released in Australia and Europe, if the machine is a much a success in these regions as with the US and Japan, then I can't realisticlly see another handheld anytime soon. Furthermore merely a portable GameCube is hardly innovative (more like a PSP copy), which contradicts Nintendo's philosophy on innovation, hence I can't see anything of the sort happening.

UltraGekko - January 22, 2005 09:53 AM (GMT)
You have to remember most of this is rumour and speculation so if there was a portable Cube in the works its not going to happen anytime soon.

Remember Nintendo likes to maximize profits which is why it is using PS1 era hardware in its latest portable. Also Nintendo can't afford to 'innovate' forever if it doesn't pay off. While DS has got off to a good start in US and Japan, sales of the PSP have started to pickup in Japan (It actually outsold the DS this last week ending 16th if only by a couple thousand).

The following is speculation on my part so don't take it as fact. I think Nintendo failed to miniaturize the Cube hardware into something cost effective and knowing that Sony was coming out with a handheld they had to do something to counteract this so they took project Nitro, added an extra screen and touch capabilities and called it DS. I think this is also why they purposely didn't call the DS the next GameBoy.

Who knows, the GB Evolution may actually merge the two 'pillars' into one again with a unit that can play both DS and GCN games.

Gio - January 22, 2005 11:30 AM (GMT)
We could be seeing this launch with the same Revolution or after. I wouldn't expect seeing it earlier though.
Still, Nintendo might want to keep this Third Pillar stuff, meaning the Gameboy Evolution would replace the advance. Yet continue to sell DS units.

borgster101 - January 23, 2005 03:47 AM (GMT)
That's sounds all fine and dandy but how in the hell is Nintendo going to sell both DS and Gameboy Evolution units together? Despite what Nintendo says about a "third pillar" consumers will not look at the situation like this, a new gameboy with GCN quality graphics will be believed to be a replacement to the DS, hence sales of DS will fall, developers will stop making DS games and go to GBEvo games and hence the DS would ultimatly be a failure, Nintendo would be shooting themselves in the foot, considiring the inital success of the platform.

I dont buy this third pillar stuff, because originally it meant that the DS was not going to replace the GBA, but what happened, it did! Developers have stopped making GBA games and have now shifted to DS and PSP production. The third pillar comment has already not surfaced since whether Nintendo likes it or not, the DS is replacing the GBA.

Fyuusii - January 23, 2005 05:14 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (borgster101 @ Jan 23 2005, 11:47 AM)
That's sounds all fine and dandy but how in the hell is Nintendo going to sell both DS and Gameboy Evolution units together? Despite what Nintendo says about a "third pillar" consumers will not look at the situation like this, a new gameboy with GCN quality graphics will be believed to be a replacement to the DS, hence sales of DS will fall, developers will stop making DS games and go to GBEvo games and hence the DS would ultimatly be a failure, Nintendo would be shooting themselves in the foot, considiring the inital success of the platform.

I dont buy this third pillar stuff, because originally it meant that the DS was not going to replace the GBA, but what happened, it did! Developers have stopped making GBA games and have now shifted to DS and PSP production. The third pillar comment has already not surfaced since whether Nintendo likes it or not, the DS is replacing the GBA.

My sentiments exactly. The general public doesn't tend to be open-minded enough to see things this way. Most people will instantly see that one handheld is somewhat superior to the other (whether or not one actually is) and the other will fall as a result.

As far as I'm concerned, I'd love to see less effort placed on crazy marketing and development strategies and quite simply, more focus on creating top-quality games. :)

Pauly - January 23, 2005 08:06 AM (GMT)
I'm hoping this is merely a rumour because I don't like this idea at all, and I can see where it's going. They will produce and market this as the competitor to the PSP and no doubt GCN ports will be on the agenda. Instead of pursuing innovation in the DS, this new machine will get a lot of development time and money poured into. Keep the handheld genre sacred for heavens sake!

Gio - January 23, 2005 08:10 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (borgster101 @ Jan 23 2005, 02:47 PM)
I dont buy this third pillar stuff, because originally it meant that the DS was not going to replace the GBA, but what happened, it did!

I dunno about that, the SP is still enjoying pretty good sales.

BrotherEstapol - January 23, 2005 09:30 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Pãúlÿ @ Jan 23 2005, 07:06 PM)
I'm hoping this is merely a rumour because I don't like this idea at all, and I can see where it's going. They will produce and market this as the competitor to the PSP and no doubt GCN ports will be on the agenda.

It's my understanding that the unit would be able to play actual GCN games, and thus there would be hardly any ports, as you could just pop-in the originals.

Gio - January 23, 2005 09:42 AM (GMT)
Maybe this is why Nintendo are going to keep on supporting the GCN? The plot thickens.. :P

BrotherEstapol - January 23, 2005 09:49 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gio @ Jan 23 2005, 08:42 PM)
Maybe this is why Nintendo are going to keep on supporting the GCN? The plot thickens.. :P

Ooooh, didn't think of that. :P

[DZ] - January 23, 2005 12:52 PM (GMT)
Well I think this, the Evolution is direct competition to the PStwo.
If, its not that, then its gonna be one huge Tamagotchi.

BrotherEstapol - January 23, 2005 01:07 PM (GMT)
How could it possibly be competition to the PStwo if Nintendo first started developing it just after the GCN had launched?

Pauly - January 23, 2005 03:18 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (BrotherEstapol @ Jan 23 2005, 07:30 PM)
QUOTE (Pãúlÿ @ Jan 23 2005, 07:06 PM)
I'm hoping this is merely a rumour because I don't like this idea at all, and I can see where it's going. They will produce and market this as the competitor to the PSP and no doubt GCN ports will be on the agenda.

It's my understanding that the unit would be able to play actual GCN games, and thus there would be hardly any ports, as you could just pop-in the originals.

The screen would still have to be really big for half the gamecube games to be enjoyable.

borgster101 - January 24, 2005 10:29 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gio @ Jan 23 2005, 06:10 PM)
QUOTE (borgster101 @ Jan 23 2005, 02:47 PM)
I dont buy this third pillar stuff, because originally it meant that the DS was not going to replace the GBA, but what happened, it did!

I dunno about that, the SP is still enjoying pretty good sales.

I wasn't refering to sales, I was refering to the development of new games. Obviously the SP will continue to sell for now, since the DS hasnt been released worldwide yet, the sales wont vanish instantly.

When I said the DS replaced the GBA, I meant that in terms of the development of new software, as I said in my previous post the arrival of the DS has resulted in the fall in development in GBA software, there isn't much on the horizon for the GBA in 2005.


If this supposed new machine plays actual GCN games, then doesn't it essentially translate into smaller designed GCN (i.e. PSTwo, with the exception of it apparantly having its own screen), if so then it is hardly a new system.

UltraGekko - January 25, 2005 04:35 AM (GMT)
Craig from IGN DS has a slightly different answer to Matt:

QUOTE
So, yes, there's been talk of the next generation Game Boy, which shouldn't be surprising considering that even when the Nintendo DS was revealed, Nintendo has always stood by the statement that the DS wasn't the next Game Boy, and that work was continuing on the future of the Game Boy line. Matt seems to feel that the next Game Boy system, strongly hinted for an announcement at this year's E3 show, will be a portable GameCube. My theory is a little closer to reality: it will most likely use GameCube technology, but it won't play GameCube games. The graphics chipset and hardware, still pretty damn impressive, will, if we've been hearing the rumors correctly, be shrunk down and be made power conservative, which would certainly bring the Game Boy branding in line with what Sony's pushing with the PSP.

But why am I saying it won't it play GameCube games? Well, first of all, games for the GameCube weren't made with conservation in mind. Many titles constantly read the disc for data, and that motor would cause a severe drain on the power of the unit, something Sony's frowning upon in the world of the PSP. Two is multiplayer: In Super Smash Bros. Melee, how do you get four systems to talk to each other wirelessly in a way that will "trick" the software into thinking it's playing off one unit with four controllers? It may be technically possible knowing the hardware skills of Nintendo engineers, but I'd guess that they'd leave something like this out of the realm of possibility.

But on the positive side, if Nintendo goes the way of using GameCube technology for its next system, much of what developers have created engine-wise can potentially be moved to the handheld with very little cost. And the GameCube has already proven itself worthy enough to emulate hardware as powerful as a Nintendo 64 (think Ocarina of Time) which makes it a bit more feasible for Nintendo to revive existing properties on the Game Boy "Evolution" (or whatever they're going to call it) for low cost game software. And, of course, it enables Nintendo to re-issue existing GameCube games as upgraded "remixes," much like what the company has already done with Super NES titles on the Game Boy Advance.

Yes, this is the more likely of the two scenarios.

borgster101 - January 25, 2005 06:46 AM (GMT)
So basically it will turn out to be a Nintendo version of the PSP?


What happened to the DS "changing our industry" to quote Reggie from Nintendo? Put simply, this machine doesnt fit in with Nintendo's comments. All they said was that the DS is a third pillar to co-exist besides the exisiting GameCube and Gameboy Advance. This doesnt mean a new gameboy will arrive. If another Gameboy is released, the DS will die a very quick death.

Gio - January 26, 2005 12:50 AM (GMT)
Hell, I'm up for Smash Bros. Melee DX :lol:
Nobody says they're going to make port after port with no new games though.
I for one, love the idea of the power of the cube in my hands. :P

borgster101 - January 26, 2005 01:09 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gio @ Jan 26 2005, 10:50 AM)
Nobody says they're going to make port after port with no new games though.
I for one, love the idea of the power of the cube in my hands. :P

Nevertheless, the GB Evolution doesnt make sense when you consider that the DS was just released and Nintendo's philosohpy on changing the way games are played. A Super Smash Bros game could easily be developed for the DS anyway.

BrotherEstapol - January 26, 2005 02:54 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (borgster101 @ Jan 26 2005, 12:09 PM)
QUOTE (Gio @ Jan 26 2005, 10:50 AM)
Nobody says they're going to make port after port with no new games though.
I for one, love the idea of the power of the cube in my hands. :P

Nevertheless, the GB Evolution doesnt make sense when you consider that the DS was just released and Nintendo's philosohpy on changing the way games are played.

Perhaps the GBE will incorparate DS funtions?

Say Developers tell Nintendo that the microphone was shit, but they really liked the touch screen idea. So Nintendo incorparate a touch screen into the GBE, and leave the Mic behind with the DS. :)

I just couldn't see Nintendo removing a poplular feature, and if the touch screen turns out to be a hit, Nintendo should really keep it.

Gio - January 26, 2005 06:07 AM (GMT)
I think the Evolution shouldn't incorporate the touch-screen, I mean, Gameboys aren't supposed to have touch screens, it's not right.

~DC - January 26, 2005 06:34 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gio @ Jan 26 2005, 04:07 PM)
I think the Evolution shouldn't incorporate the touch-screen, I mean, Gameboys aren't supposed to have touch screens, it's not right.

That is like saying the N64 control pad was not right simply because Nintendo decided to scrap the directional buttons and revolutionise the way games were played.

borgster101 - January 26, 2005 11:20 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (BrotherEstapol @ Jan 26 2005, 12:54 PM)
QUOTE (borgster101 @ Jan 26 2005, 12:09 PM)
QUOTE (Gio @ Jan 26 2005, 10:50 AM)
Nobody says they're going to make port after port with no new games though.
I for one, love the idea of the power of the cube in my hands. :P

Nevertheless, the GB Evolution doesnt make sense when you consider that the DS was just released and Nintendo's philosohpy on changing the way games are played.

Perhaps the GBE will incorparate DS funtions?

Say Developers tell Nintendo that the microphone was shit, but they really liked the touch screen idea. So Nintendo incorparate a touch screen into the GBE, and leave the Mic behind with the DS. :)

I just couldn't see Nintendo removing a poplular feature, and if the touch screen turns out to be a hit, Nintendo should really keep it.

Maybe, but I still can't believe that another Nintendo handheld is already being talked about when the DS hasnt even come out yet, it's this sort of thing that starts to worry me since it will shorten the life of the previous consoles, it's just too soon to be discussing another handheld. Was anyone discussing the Revolution a few weeks before the GCN launch, of course not, we were all excited about the arrival of a new console, not the generation after.



BrotherEstapol - January 27, 2005 06:01 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (borgster101 @ Jan 27 2005, 10:20 AM)
Maybe, but I still can't believe that another Nintendo handheld is already being talked about when the DS hasnt even come out yet, it's this sort of thing that starts to worry me since it will shorten the life of the previous consoles, it's just too soon to be discussing another handheld. Was anyone discussing the Revolution a few weeks before the GCN launch, of course not, we were all excited about the arrival of a new console, not the generation after.

Well the thing is, the Revo was in development quite a while ago, and by the looks of things, I'd say it would have been anounced at E3-2k5.
Now that would have given the GBA at least another year of free riegn, but the PSP came along at a really bad time, so the DS was slapped together to defend te portable market, thus fucking up Nintendo's master plan.

Though it's not like the DS is a total flop (yet), so Nintendo shouldn't be too annoyed.

Although I guess if Nintendo wait till say...06 to announce/release the GBE, they could make it alot cheaper, and the gab between handhelds would be alot smaller, so the blow of another handheld would be softened a tad.

*sigh* :(

Damn you Sony! I hope you make a loss on every PSP sold! :angry:

CAOTIC - January 27, 2005 06:08 AM (GMT)
Well Nintendo assumed from day one that DS would stand alone as a 'third tier' and would not replace the GameBoy. So either they are deluded, or it really was the pressure from Sony (to force Nintendo to release the DS). The PSP isn't doing all that spectacularly in Japan though. It might come down to how many units Sony shipped, but the DS thomped it during the Christmas period.

The PSP isn't bothering me... yet.

BrotherEstapol - January 27, 2005 06:26 AM (GMT)
Yeah, but the PSP is catching up overall, and has overtaken the DS in recent weeks.

It'll be a while till we find out who'll come out on top on this race methinks.

borgster101 - January 27, 2005 09:42 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (BrotherEstapol @ Jan 27 2005, 04:01 PM)
Well the thing is, the Revo was in development quite a while ago, and by the looks of things, I'd say it would have been anounced at E3-2k5.
Now that would have given the GBA at least another year of free riegn, but the PSP came along at a really bad time, so the DS was slapped together to defend te portable market, thus fucking up Nintendo's master plan.

Though it's not like the DS is a total flop (yet), so Nintendo shouldn't be too annoyed.

Although I guess if Nintendo wait till say...06 to announce/release the GBE, they could make it alot cheaper, and the gab between handhelds would be alot smaller, so the blow of another handheld would be softened a tad.

*sigh* :(

Damn you Sony! I hope you make a loss on every PSP sold! :angry:

I dont really like to think of the DS as something that was put together merely to temporarly combat the PSP, until it's true competition (the GB Evolution) is released, kind of puts you off wanting to buy a DS you know.

ultracrazy1 - February 11, 2005 10:32 AM (GMT)
*Post edited because it was to similar to a later post of mine* >_>

Camera huh? I don't think its that good an idea. A phone with a 1 megapixel camera costs over $700, but a 3 megapixel camera costs less than $400. You can use your left over money to buy a decent phone that doesn't have a built in camera. I'm just not into all-in-one devices. Too many of the devices just seem shite compared to the stand alone stuff. Can't remember the last time I was playing gameboy and had the urge to take a photo of something.

Gio - February 12, 2005 07:45 AM (GMT)
Wouldn't it be cool if the Gameboy Evolution had an inbuilt Camera, sort of like the Gameboy Camera.

kami - February 12, 2005 09:12 AM (GMT)
Cool, but probably wouldn't be too practical to have it inbuilt. There probably aren't too many uses for such a camera.

[DZ] - February 12, 2005 09:17 AM (GMT)
Hey, maybe the Gameboy Evo is the Nintendo 21?! :o

:P

Gio - February 12, 2005 09:32 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (kami @ Feb 12 2005, 08:12 PM)
Cool, but probably wouldn't be too practical to have it inbuilt. There probably aren't too many uses for such a camera.

Kami, have you played the Gameboy Camera? It's hella fun. ^_^
And you see these in-built cameras in tiny mobile phones, so It wouldn't take much space in that respect.

BrotherEstapol - February 12, 2005 09:54 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gio @ Feb 12 2005, 08:32 PM)
QUOTE (kami @ Feb 12 2005, 08:12 PM)
Cool, but probably wouldn't be too practical to have it inbuilt. There probably aren't too many uses for such a camera.

Kami, have you played the Gameboy Camera? It's hella fun. ^_^
And you see these in-built cameras in tiny mobile phones, so It wouldn't take much space in that respect.

Have seen how shit the photos come out though?
Unless you buy a really good phone, the cameras are as bad as 1st generation web-cams.

So Nintendo would have to put a damn good camera in the console for it to be worth it, and if that's the case, the price would probably go up.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree